Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
New redistricting maps may be the ones

New redistricting maps may be the ones

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}

If an end to the decennial redistricting process is the treasure you seek, the Legislative Service Agency’s new maps may contain the ‘X’ that marks the spot.

The agency is Iowa’s nonpartisan legal and fiscal agency, and this week it published its second proposal for new political maps for the next decade.

It’s all part of the redistricting process, in which states every 10 years redraw their political boundaries to reflect population shifts and changes. Redistricting this year has been slowed by delayed federal Census results due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Majority Republicans in the Senate rejected LSA’s first proposal. Once those maps were published, it immediately felt likely Republicans would do just that. But this set of maps feels different, and Republicans may feel comfortable enough to accept and adopt them. We’ll find out Thursday, when the Legislature returns for a second special session to consider and vote on the new proposal.

It’s not that this second set of maps is more favorable to Republicans than LSA’s first proposal, although one could probably argue that. It’s more than that.

For one, LSA did everything asked of them when Senate Republicans rejected the first proposal. Republicans told LSA they rejected the maps because there was too much deviation in the population of some districts, and that some districts were not sufficiently compact, geographically speaking.

According to LSA’s calculations, the second set of maps contains congressional and statehouse districts that have smaller population deviations and are more geographically compact. Check and check.

And the newly proposed congressional maps would have a much less chaotic political impact.

Republicans insisted the potential political impacts of the congressional maps in the first proposal did not influence their decision. They have to say that, because they don’t want to appear that political considerations are driving their decisions. Let’s say just for argument’s sake, the congressional maps in the first proposal did cause some Republicans some heartburn. After all, they would have made eastern Iowa’s 1st congressional district a virtual Democratic lock, while giving Republicans more of an edge in southeastern Iowa’s 2nd District.

Under the newly proposed maps, Iowa’s 1st, 2nd and 3rd congressional districts all would remain politically competitive, going by the latest state voter registration numbers. All three districts’ Democratic and Republican voter registration numbers would be separated by fewer than three percentage points.

Western Iowa’s 4th District would remain a Republican stronghold.

Yes, there are still roughly 60 incumbent state legislators who would be drawn into districts with each other. But avoiding grouping lawmakers is difficult. There were approximately the same number in LSA’s first proposal. Clearly that number is not coming down in any significant way; legislators are going to have to make their peace with that.

So it would seem like these are maps that Republicans, with their majorities in both the Senate and House, could accept. House Republicans were ready to approve the first maps, so it’s hard to imagine they’ll have an issue with this new proposal. The key lies within the Senate Republican caucus.

Statehouse Democrats are, as they did in Round 1, urging Republicans to approve these maps and complete the redistricting process.

To be fair, if Republicans reject these new maps, that’s still fair game and does nothing to sully the reputation of Iowa’s widely praised redistricting process. Iowa legislators have, in the past, taken the process to the third set of maps. But one can also understand why statehouse Democrats have been sounding the alarm. While some of their claims have been hyperbolic, statehouse Republicans have, since gaining full control of the state lawmaking process in 2017, not shown much of an inclination to ease into their agenda. Simply put: if they’ve wanted to do something, they’ve done it, no matter who and how many howled. So it’s not difficult to see why Democrats are calling on Republicans to stop short of going to a third set of proposed maps and enacting Republican-drawn amendments.

That, while not illegal, absolutely would place a partisan stain on the sterling reputation of Iowa’s generally nonpartisan process.

A vote this Thursday to approve these new maps would make all of those concerns disappear. And these seem like just the maps to do it.

Erin Murphy covers Iowa politics and government for Lee Enterprises. His email address is erin.murphy@lee.net. Follow him on Twitter at @ErinDMurphy.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

Kyle Rittenhouse is 18 years old. On Aug. 25, 2020, when Rittenhouse killed two men during a night of civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, he was 17. But when he took the stand during his murder trial, he looked like he could be 13. Defendants in murder trials often do themselves no favors by testifying in their own defense, but Rittenhouse probably helped himself. He was soft-spoken and ...

You've probably heard the old political maxim, most popular in the crime-ridden 1970s, that a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. In the 2020s, it turns out that a criminal justice reformer is now a white dude who suddenly finds himself in jail after taking part in an insurrection to keep Donald Trump in the White House. Right-wingers busted for taking part in the Jan. 6 riot at the ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News

News Alert